Saturday, May 5, 2012

Greek Restructuring: The Dominant Media Frenzy for the Past 6 Months

Image Source: The Economist

For weeks, the market was perfectly in tune with the news released about the Greek government and the Eurozone. If there was good news indicating a fix the Eurozone problems, the market was up and vice-versa. That game finally ran its course when news surfaced that the Greek government would need a second round of bailout funds by March 20th to avert a default on €14.5 billion worth of bonds coming due. Investors feared that a failure to obtain these funds could trigger another round of global financial meltdowns.

It’s important to recognize that the Eurozone debt problems date back to late 2008, when the Eurozone agreed on its first stimulus package of €200 billion. In April of 2009, the EU ordered France, Spain, Ireland and Greece to reduce their budget deficits and then in November, the EU, following the Dubai sovereign debt crisis, began investigating the balance sheets of all of its members. Their exploration found that Greece’s debt burdened amounted to 113% of GDP, nearly double the allowable Eurozone limit of 60%. The following year (2010) can be characterized as a year of bailouts. The Eurozone and the IMF gave Greece €22 billion initially, but followed that up with another bailout package of €110 billion later in the year after revised Greek deficit figures were worse than originally reported. The EU and IMF then agreed to bail out Ireland with €85 billion. The bailouts were not finished. In 2011, €78 billion was given to Portugal and ANOTHER €109 billion was given to Greece with the hopes of resolving their crisis and preventing contagion among other European economies. It would take pages to fully delve into the EU’s decisions over the past three years, but at this point, the burden that Greece has put on the European and global economy should be evident.

In return for another €130 billion in bailout funds, Greek MP’s passed a controversial package of austerity measures on February 12, 2012. Riots ensued, but the government ensured that this package would set the foundation for future economic solidarity. The austerity measures included job and salary cuts for government workers, pension reforms, public sector job cuts, and a lowering of the minimum wage. Another part of the debt exchange meant private bondholders were expected to take a hefty loss (a 53.5% write-down) as Greece swaps out its existing debt for new, longer term bonds with lower interest rates. The terms of the bill aim to not only decrease government spending in general, but to decrease Greece’s debt from its current level of 160% of GDP to 120% by 2020.

At the forefront of Greece’s effort to force private bondholders to accept sizeable haircuts is the actions’ relation to outstanding credit default swaps on Greek debt which were designed to transfer the credit exposure of fixed income products between parties. The purchaser of a swap receives credit protection while the seller guarantees the credit worthiness of the debt security. In doing so, the default risk associated with that debt security is transferred from the holder of the security to the seller of the swap. A CDS is basically considered insurance against non-payment, whereby “credit events” involving the underlying security incur compensation from the CDS issuer to the buyer. The question of whether this restructuring plan would be considered a Credit Event in the CDS market was the main focus amongst Greek CDS holders.

On March 9, 2012, the ISDA (International Swaps and Derivatives Association) announced that the recent restructuring deal is in fact considered a Credit Event. The determining factor of this decision was because the ISDA invoked the Collective Action Clause (CAC) which forced all holders of Greek debt to accept the exchange and write-down offer by the Greek government. The plan involves a “haircut” and is binding to all holders and thus, is considered a Restructuring Credit Event. The current CDS credit protection on Greek sovereign debt as of March 2nd was approximately $3.2 billion. Although this is the largest sovereign CDS payment on record, many believe this is an amount that the markets can easily handle.

All in all, considering the healthy signal the CDS market provides coupled with the fact that CDS volume is at normal levels, one can conclude that the negative effects of the Greek restructuring on the CDS market and hopefully the global market as a whole have so far been averted. However, Greek solvency still remains questionable and judging by the Greek response to austerity, there has been no sign of real economic improvement. The true question is whether the markets have priced in all the negative possibilities with Greece and contagion in the Euro correctly this time. Should debt 'fears' arise again this summer, it will decrease confidence in the effectiveness of monetary policy and liquidity pumping policies of central banks. Even now, credit markets are not buying the fragile facade of recovery as equity markets rallied. This summer, we may see that divergence correct, one way or the other.

by Ryan Porter

Sunday, April 22, 2012

Welcome to our Blog!

Welcome to the Villanova Equity Society Blog. We look forward to posting our weekly economics update, sector journals, and monthly update. Also look forward to trade ideas, market commentary and news updates.


VTR: Best way to play undervalued REITs

 REITs are a liquid way of investing in real estate that frees investors from worrying about the arduous process of selling properties in order to realize yields from their investments. There are two main models for REITs, equity based (eREITs) and mortgage based (mREITs). mREITs borrow short term loans and use that cash, and other cash capital, to purchase long-term debt (mortgages). Because long-term debt has higher interest rates than short-term debt, mREITs make money on the "spread" between the rates. If the mREIT can make its short-term payments, it can usually generate decent profit. That profit is then distributed to its shareholders in accordance with its tax regulations. mREITs, as a business model, are becoming under scrutiny recently regarding leverage with their debt-to-equity ratios averaging above 5:1. In addition to high leverage levels, the industries profit is being manipulated by lower interest rates from the Fed. The eREIT model on the other hand, is based on equity and revenues made from leasing properties held. There is very little leverage, making their dividend yields much lower than mREITs, however with that also comes less risk.

Some eREITs are specific to regions or types of real estate, as is the case with the Equity Society’s newest holding, Ventas Inc (NYSE: VTR). Ventas invests in properties focused on the needs of senior citizens adopting the model of an eREIT. Their holdings include senior living facilities, hospitals, and a number of private medical offices. With over 1300 holdings in various aspects of healthcare and senior living and growing, continuing to renew leases is increasingly important for Ventas. Last week the company acquired Cogdell Spencer Inc. gaining 72 high quality medical offices (MOBs). 

Although the real estate market has seen better days, the Baby Boomer generation will begin entering retirement within the next five years and Ventas is well-positioned to play the demographic shift. Furthermore, Ventas is also a liquid and relatively low-risk way to call the bottom of the real-estate market, which is a leveraged play on the economic recovery in the US.

by Lucas Hougo                                                                                                                  

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Consumers Spend Their Way Through Attacking Gas Pump; Sluggish Economy


At the close of the Summer of 2011, and even lingering into the Fall months, the buzz around Wall Street revolved around one word – Volatility. With inter-stock correlations at bleeding edge highs and stock picking seemingly thrown to the wayside, it was time of a great uncertainty for investors and their saving/spending decisions. Soon however, the whipsaw seemed to moderate, with the VIX volatility index retreating back to pre-Summer levels.

Since this time, it seems that the average consumer has responded the way that any self respecting American knows how, with their checkbook, and with force. With the “volatility veil” having been lifted, and unemployment stabilizing at what seems to be a moderate clip (down to 8.2% in March, off 10%+ near end of 2010) the consumer seems to be “shaking it off” through their spending, specifically in discretionary applications.